Django community: RSS
This page, updated regularly, aggregates Django Q&A from the Django community.
-
Saving a django modelform to model db
the following code is not saving to the db, the code works well in shell. everything is fine but not saving to db.could someone figure it out? def loginapp(request): if request.method == "POST": form=LoginInterfaceForm(request.POST) if form.is_valid(): form.clean() login = form.save(commit=False) login.save( expecting the form data to save in db -
How to entry to a function in python breakpoint in terminal
I try to entry to a function that I called on my code but in terminal, pdb just go through it like this I share with you : -> def get_context_data(self, *args, **context): (Pdb) n --Return-- > d:\rebound\rebound\modules\blog\views.py(135)PostDetail()-><cell at 0x00...1DA4A0: empty> -> def get_context_data(self, *args, **context): so which command if I hit, can go entry to called function -
Expand a QuerySet with all related objects
class Hobby(models.Model): name = models.TextField() class Person(models.Model): name = models.TextField() created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) hobbies = models.ManyToManyField(Hobby, related_name='persons') class TShirt(models.Model): name = models.TextField() person = models.ForeignKey( Person, related_name='tshirts', on_delete=models.CASCADE, ) class Shirt(models.Model): name = models.TextField() person = models.ForeignKey( Person, related_name='shirts', on_delete=models.CASCADE, ) class Shoes(models.Model): name = models.TextField() person = models.ForeignKey( Person, related_name='shoes', on_delete=models.CASCADE, ) Given a queryset of Person, e.g. Person.objects.order_by('-created_at')[:4] How can I make a queryset which also includes all the objects related to the Person objects in that queryset? The input QuerySet only has Person objects, but the output one should have Hobby, Shoes, TShirt, Shirt` objects (if there are shirts/tshirts/shoes that reference any of the people in the original queryset). I've only been able to think of solutions that rely on knowing what the related objects are, e.g. TShirt.objects.filter(person__in=person_queryset), but I would like a solution that will work for all models that reference Person without me having to one-by-one code each query for each referencing model. -
Can i user djangos admin for users also , i am buildng an algo trading bot in django [closed]
Currently, I am building an algorithmic trading bot with Django, and I don't expect many users—mainly just me and a few of my friends. Given this, do I need to implement custom templates for user interfaces, or can I simply use Django's default admin interface for managing users as well? a user can be able to activate the avalialbe startegy and the trade will automatically happen -
Queryset pagination in websocket django rest framework
I have a websocket in my django drf project and a function that should read all of Notification objects from database and return them via a serializer like bellow : @database_sync_to_async def get_all_notifications(self): paginator = CustomPageNumberPagination() notifications = Notification.objects.all().order_by('-created_at') context = paginator.paginate_queryset(notifications, WhatQuery?) serializer = NotificationSerializer(context=context, many=True) return paginator.get_paginated_response(serializer.data) I do not know how to get request in socket and I think it is not accessable in socket paginator.paginate_queryset(queryset, request) what is the solution here? -
How to create graphql type for a django model which has many-to-many field
I have django model named profiles. It has some basic fields and many-to-many field followers. This field contains a list of followers and following peoples class Profile(models.Model): user = models.OneToOneField( User, on_delete=models.CASCADE) birth_date = models.DateField( null=True, blank=True) profile_picture = models.ImageField( upload_to='user_profile_pictures/', blank=True, null=True) cover_picture = models.ImageField( upload_to='user_cover_pictures/', blank=True, null=True) profile_description = models.TextField( blank=True, null=True) profile_rating = models.IntegerField( default=0) followers = models.ManyToManyField( 'self', symmetrical=False, related_name='following', blank=True) I used chatGpt to create a type for this model class ProfileType(DjangoObjectType): class Meta: model = Profile fields = "__all__" followers = graphene.List(lambda: ProfileType) following = graphene.List(lambda: ProfileType) followers_count = graphene.Int() following_count = graphene.Int() def resolve_followers(self, info): return self.followers.all() def resolve_following(self, info): return self.following.all() def resolve_followers_count(self, info): return self.followers.count() def resolve_following_count(self, info): return self.following.count() This issue is graphene List doesn't have the all() and count() methods. How I should handle this field? -
improve the query structure or how can i use prefetch related
I have a situation and I'm not able to think of how to use prefetch_related or improve the structure of my query, here is the scenario - rows = DocumentRows.objects.filter(item=item_id).values_list("document", flat=True) qs = Document.objects.filter(id__in = rows) return qs Document contains ID and other imp related info, Document is linked to DocumentRows as a foreign key, and is of type one-to-many Relationship. Each Document can have multiple rows and each row contain item (item_id). I'm trying to filter document based on items present in document rows. Thanks -
WebSocket Returns 200 Instead of 101 with Apache2: How to Properly Configure Proxy for WebSocket Handling?
I am trying to configure Apache2 to proxy WebSocket traffic for my application, but I’m facing an issue where the WebSocket connection returns a 200 status instead of the expected 101 status code. I have the following configuration in my default-ssl.conf file for SSL and WebSocket proxy: ServerName <domain> <IfModule mod_ssl.c> <VirtualHost _default_:443> ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost DocumentRoot /home/root/app ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key # WebSocket upgrade headers SetEnvIf Request_URI "^/ws" upgrade_connection RequestHeader set Connection "Upgrade" env=upgrade_connection RequestHeader set Upgrade "websocket" env=upgrade_connection # Proxy to WebSocket server ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass /wss/ wss://127.0.0.1:8080/ ProxyPassReverse /wss/ wss://127.0.0.1:8080/ # Proxy WebSocket traffic to Daphne (ASGI) RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP:UPGRADE} ^WebSocket$ [NC,OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP:CONNECTION} ^Upgrade$ [NC] RewriteRule .* ws://127.0.0.1:8080%{REQUEST_URI} [P,QSA,L] # Proxy settings ProxyRequests on ProxyPass / http://<ip>:8000/ ProxyPassReverse / http://<ip>:8000/ </VirtualHost> Despite this configuration, the WebSocket connection is returning an HTTP 200 status instead of the expected WebSocket handshake (101). What could be causing this issue and how can I resolve it? -
Why am I getting a 404 error with /None appended to the URL in my Django application? [closed]
it appears that after every successful request to a valid URL (e.g., /tasks/manager-dashboard/, /users/admin/dashboard/, etc.), an additional request is made to the same URL but with None appended to the end (e.g., /tasks/manager-dashboard/None). This results in a 404 Not Found error. Why are all my routes being redirected to /None? What could be causing this issue, and how can I fix it? Here’s the relevant log from my terminal: [03/Feb/2025 06:13:55] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 22745 Not Found: /None [03/Feb/2025 06:13:55] "GET /None HTTP/1.1" 404 16655 [03/Feb/2025 06:13:59] "GET /tasks/dashboard/ HTTP/1.1" 302 0 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:01] "GET /tasks/manager-dashboard/ HTTP/1.1" 200 30428 Not Found: /tasks/manager-dashboard/None [03/Feb/2025 06:14:01] "GET /tasks/manager-dashboard/None HTTP/1.1" 404 18835 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:07] "POST /users/logout/ HTTP/1.1" 302 0 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:07] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 22083 login form initialized [03/Feb/2025 06:14:08] "GET /users/login/ HTTP/1.1" 200 21320 login form initialized [03/Feb/2025 06:14:19] "POST /users/login/ HTTP/1.1" 302 0 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:20] "GET /tasks/dashboard/ HTTP/1.1" 302 0 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:22] "GET /users/admin/dashboard/ HTTP/1.1" 200 34903 Not Found: /users/admin/dashboard/None [03/Feb/2025 06:14:22] "GET /users/admin/dashboard/None HTTP/1.1" 404 19097 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:31] "GET /users/admin/user-list/ HTTP/1.1" 200 26112 Not Found: /users/admin/user-list/None [03/Feb/2025 06:14:31] "GET /users/admin/user-list/None HTTP/1.1" 404 19097 [03/Feb/2025 06:14:58] "GET /users/admin/user-list/ HTTP/1.1" 200 26111 Not Found: /users/admin/user-list/None [03/Feb/2025 06:14:58] "GET /users/admin/user-list/None HTTP/1.1" … -
Dockerized Django admin failing
I've no idea where to go with this as its deep into the admin templates. I haven't touched any of it, obviously. This is a project I am moving over to a django container. It worked in the VM just fine. Full server logs below this image... Header error: dcdc_django | Internal Server Error: /admin/mainapp/divesite/add/ dcdc_django | Traceback (most recent call last): dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/core/handlers/exception.py", line 55, in inner dcdc_django | response = get_response(request) dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py", line 220, in _get_response dcdc_django | response = response.render() dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/response.py", line 114, in render dcdc_django | self.content = self.rendered_content dcdc_django | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/response.py", line 92, in rendered_content dcdc_django | return template.render(context, self._request) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/backends/django.py", line 107, in render dcdc_django | return self.template.render(context) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line 171, in render dcdc_django | return self._render(context) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/test/utils.py", line 114, in instrumented_test_render dcdc_django | return self.nodelist.render(context) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line 1008, in render dcdc_django | return SafeString("".join([node.render_annotated(context) for node in self])) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django | File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/django/template/base.py", line 969, in render_annotated dcdc_django | return self.render(context) dcdc_django | ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^ dcdc_django … -
django daphne ModuleNotFoundError docker error
I got this error "ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'project'" when I contarize my web app. I used Django with daphne. it's my settings here: Dockerfile: FROM python:3.11-slim RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \ libpq-dev gcc curl \ && apt-get clean \ && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* WORKDIR /backend COPY requirements.txt /backend/ RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r /backend/requirements.txt COPY . /backend/ WORKDIR /backend/project RUN python /backend/project/manage.py collectstatic --noinput RUN chown -R www-data:www-data /backend USER www-data ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 ENV PYTHONPATH="." ENV DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=project.settings EXPOSE 8000 #CMD ["python","manage.py","runserver"] CMD ["daphne", "-b", "0.0.0.0", "-p", "8000", "project.asgi:application"] docker-compose: version: '3.9' services: web: build: context: . dockerfile: dockerfile container_name: c_django working_dir: /backend/project command: > daphne -b 0.0.0.0 -p 8000 project.asgi:application # python manage.py runserver volumes: - ./backend:/backend:delegated - ./backend/project/images:/backend/project/images - ./backend/project/staticfiles:/backend/project/staticfiles ports: - 8000:8000 environment: ALLOWED_HOSTS: '*' DEBUG: 'True' SECRET_KEY: 1vbl8yp&1*c6)+-o!9r_)_1oo$x*-en^mu0#c*wcojb1j#-=20 PYTHONPATH: "." DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE: "project.settings" DATABASE_NAME: fitness DATABASE_USER: postgres DATABASE_PASSWORD: 123456 DATABASE_HOST: db DATABASE_PORT: 5432 REDIS_URL: redis://redis:6379/1 depends_on: - db - redis networks: - frontend_backend db: image: postgres:15 container_name: c_postgres environment: POSTGRES_USER: postgres POSTGRES_PASSWORD: 123456 POSTGRES_DB: fitness ports: - 5432:5432 volumes: - postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data networks: - frontend_backend frontend: build: context: ../frontend dockerfile: Dockerfile container_name: c_frontend volumes: - ../frontend/dist:/usr/share/nginx/html - ../frontend/nginx/nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf ports: - 8080:80 depends_on: - … -
too many redirects error, mod_wsgi apache and django (python-venv)
I have a problem, with django and apache (mod_wsgi), I get the browser error "too many redirects". Here my files and apache configuration sito.urls from django.contrib import admin from django.urls import path, include urlpatterns = [ path('', include('sito.urls')), path('admin/', admin.site.urls), path('display_pingaction/', include('sito.urls')), path('display_config/', include('sito.urls')), ] project.urls from django.urls import path from sito import views urlpatterns = [ path('', views.index, name='index'), path('display_config/', views.display_config, name='display_config'), path('display_pingaction/', views.display_pingaction, name='display_pingaction'), ] views.py from django.http import HttpResponse from django.shortcuts import render from django.template import loader from .models import PingAction, Config from . import views def index(request): return HttpResponse("Hello, world.") def display_config(request): config_list = Config.objects.all() template = loader.get_template("display_config.html") context = { "config_list": config_list, } return HttpResponse(template.render(context, request)) httpd.conf WSGIScriptAlias /app-web /mnt/data/Workspace/app/app-web/djangoProject/djangoProject/wsgi.py WSGIPythonHome /mnt/data/Workspace/app/app-web/app-web-env WSGIPythonPath /mnt/data/Workspace/app/app-web/djangoProject <Directory "/mnt/data/Workspace/app/app-web/djangoProject"> <Files wsgi.py> Require all granted </Files> </Directory> When I navigate to http://localhost/app-web/ I get correcty "Hello, world.", but if I want the display_config page (http://localhost/app-web/display_config) the browser show me the "too many redirects" error. If I use python manage.py runserver and navigate to http://127.0.0.1:8000/app-web/display_config all works correcty. Can somebody help me please to understand what's wrong? Thank a lot -
Save all objects in QuerySet and related objects to a fixture
I've written a function to save a QuerySet to a fixture JSON file: def save_as_fixture(query_set: QuerySet, fixture_name: str, app_label: str='mainapp'): app_config = apps.get_app_config(app_label) fixture_dir = os.path.join(app_config.path, "fixtures") os.makedirs(fixture_dir, exist_ok=True) fixture_path = os.path.join(fixture_dir, fixture_name) data = serializers.serialize("json", query_set, indent=2, use_natural_foreign_keys=True, use_natural_primary_keys=True) with open(fixture_path, 'w') as file: file.write(data) But it doesn't save related objects. I would like it to also save the objects that reference one of the objects of the QuerySet via a ForeignKey, OneToOneField, etc. How can I do that? -
Does `.all()` in Django re-query the Database or use the cache?
I am getting very conflicting messages. From Django Queryset docs, I am reading (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.1/ref/models/querysets/#django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all): When a QuerySet is evaluated, it typically caches its results. If the data in the database might have changed since a QuerySet was evaluated, you can get updated results for the same query by calling all() on a previously evaluated QuerySet. But then under the prefetch_related section, it shows that using .all() on the sub-objects uses results from the cache: >>> restaurants = Restaurant.objects.prefetch_related( ... Prefetch("pizzas", queryset=queryset), ... ) >>> vegetarian_pizzas = restaurants[0].pizzas.all() Here, apparently vegetarian_pizzas doesn't trigger a database query. So...which is it - what does all() actually do? Why does it trigger a database query on the outer but then not for sub-objects? I'm confused. -
Filter by ManyToManyField, one way
I have a model with a ManyToManyField: class Release(models.Model): #... bundled_releases = models.ManyToManyField("self", blank=True) def get_bundles(self): return Release.objects.filter(bundled_releases__in=[self.id]) I want get_bundles to only return releases that have self in their bundled_releases fields, but this way it also returns releases in self's bundled_releases field. How do I do this? -
Django: setting up project/app to use Jinja syntax in Markdown posts
I'm migrating my website from Eleventy to Django. I had Eleventy set up with some custom Nunjucks filters/shortcodes or whatever they're called so I could use Nunjucks for including responsive web images as well as custom HTML media player code for video files, instead of having to write out HTML in the Markdown file every time. I'm trying to replicate that simplification in Django via Jinja (as it's basically the same thing, by Nunjucks' own admission), but I'm having a time wrapping my head around the learning curve for the different things I need to tackle in order to do this. From what I think I understand so far, I have a few obstacles: Figuring out how to get my Django project/app to process Jinja syntax in Markdown files and convert it to HTML. I found what looks like a good context explainer here (https://stackoverflow.com/a/32254521/21423257), but it's more of a general heads-up and doesn't explain what you need to actually do to your project/app to make this work. I'm using the Markdown plugin, I assume that will be adequate but if not, I'm open to using one of the other Markdown plugins if they're better suited for this task. Posting … -
Use Oauth2+Django to get authorization toaccess user's Gmail
I was using this tutorial: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/python-django-google-authentication-and-fetching-mails-from-scratch/. However, the oauth2client library is deprecated and hasn't been touched in almost 9 years. I have looked for various tutorials, but they seem to be written by AI; they make no sense, and do things like tell you to include credentials in a piece of code that does not use credentials. So my question is, how can I implement oauth2 into my Django application so that user's can go to the Django website and give permission to read their emails? -
Gmail Oauth2 - restrict scope to only apply to emails from a certain domain [closed]
I have a Django site that uses Google Oauth2 to allow users to grant access to read and reply to their emails. GOOGLE_OAUTH2_CREDENTIALS = { 'client_id': '********************', 'client_secret': '*******', 'scope': [ 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/gmail.readonly', 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/gmail.send' ], 'redirect_uri': 'https://www.********.com/*****/', } However, for privacy and security purposes I want to set restrict the scope to only being able to read and reply to emails from a specific domain. Is it possible to modify the scope to only allow the permissions within for emails to/from a certain domain? -
Docker port forwarding not working Django app
I have a Django app that works fine locally when I run it without a container. However, when I containerize the app, create an image, and run the container, the app is not accessible at the forwarded port: http://localhost:8081 When I exec into the container and run the curl command: curl localhost:8005 I am able to see the response inside the container. Here is my Dockerfile, which I am using to build the image and run the container with some environment variables, which are present when I exec into the container: FROM python:3.11 ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED 1 RUN mkdir /app WORKDIR /app COPY requirements.txt /app RUN pip install --upgrade pip RUN pip install -r requirements.txt COPY . /app EXPOSE 8005 #ENTRYPOINT ["bash", "entrypoint.bash"] CMD ["python", "manage.py", "runserver", "0.0.0.0:8005"] To build the image and run the container, I use the following commands: docker build -t app_backend:v1 . docker run -dit --rm -p 8081:8005 --name app_backend app_backend:v1 For testing, I tried running a sample command and was able to access Nginx on port 8009, but I cannot access the Django app at the specified port: docker run -d -p 8009:80 nginx:alpine -
How can I reduce the number of queries in a queryset?
I have the following serializers: class LiteratureProductSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): author = AuthorSerializer() binding = BindingSerializer() language = LanguageSerializer() genres = GenreSerializer(many=True) class Meta: model = LiteratureProduct fields = ('year_of_manufacture', 'pages', 'isbn', 'author', 'binding', 'language', 'genres') class AccessoryProductSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): manufacturer = ManufacturerSerializer() seria = SeriaSerializer() material = MaterialSerializer() class Meta: model = AccessoryProduct fields = ('manufacturer', 'seria', 'material', 'size') class FoodProductSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): manufacturer = ManufacturerSerializer() class Meta: model = FoodProduct fields = ('manufacturer') class ClotherProductSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): material = MaterialSerializer() colors = ColorSerializer(many=True) sizes = SizeSerializer(many=True) class Meta: model = ClotherProduct fields = ('material', 'colors', 'sizes', 'year_of_manufacture') class ProductSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): category = CategorySerializer() source = SourceSerializer() literature_product = LiteratureProductSerializer() accessory_product = AccessoryProductSerializer() food_product = FoodProductSerializer() clother_product = ClotherProductSerializer() class Meta: model = Product fields = ('id', 'name', 'slug', 'description', 'image', 'price', 'discount', 'amount', 'is_active', 'weight', 'rating', 'created_date', 'category', 'source', 'literature_product', 'accessory_product', 'food_product', 'clother_product') Now I want to display information about a single object, which can belong to one of these four categories. I created the following API view. Since I have many ForeignKey and ManyToMany relationships, I used select_related and prefetch_related for optimization. Here's the code of my view: class ProductsAPIView(RetrieveAPIView): serializer_class = ProductSerializer lookup_field = 'slug' lookup_url_kwarg = 'product_slug' def get_queryset(self): return Product.objects.select_related( 'category', 'source', 'literature_product', 'literature_product__author', … -
NoReverseMatch URL using Django
Currently getting a NoReverseMatch error and not sure why. Here's the error message and relevant code: Error: Error during template rendering In template C:....<Folder><Project>\userapp\templates\userapp\details.html, error at line 11 Reverse for 'favourite' with arguments '('',)' not found. 1 pattern(s) tried: ['music/(?P<album_id>[0-9]+)/favourite\Z'] urls.py path('music/<int:album_id>/favourite/', views.favourite, name='favourite') views.py def favourite(request, album_id): albums = get_object_or_404(Album, pk=album_id) try: selected_song = albums.song_set.get(pk=request.POST['song']) except (KeyError, Song.DoesNotExist): return render(request, 'userapp/details.html', { 'albums': albums, 'error_message': "You did not select a valid song", }) else: selected_song.is_favourite = True selected_song.save() return render(request, 'userapp/details.html', {'albums': albums}) details.html {% if error_message %} <p><strong>{{ error_message }}</strong></p> {% endif %} line 11 - {% csrf_token %} {% for song in albums.song_set.all %} {{ song.song_title }} {% if song.is_favourite %} <img {% endif %} {% endfor %} -
Django ignoring DEBUG value when I use os.environ?
In my Django settings I have the following: on env.py I have the below code: os.environ.setdefault( "DEBUG", "True" ) On settings.py I have the below code: DEBUG = os.environ.get('DEBUG') == 'True' However some of the systes are not visbile after deploying but they are perfect on my local server. Please assist thank you. I tried changing the DEBUG value to false but nothing changes. -
Does calling a method from template query the database each time?
Say you have the following method in a model: def get_images(self): return ReleaseImage.objects.filter(release=self.id) And you call it from a template like so: {% if release.get_images %}{{ MEDIA_URL }}{{ release.get_images.first }}{% endif %} Does the database get queried twice, or is there some behind-the-scenes optimization that prevents this? It might be highly inefficient if not. -
Issue with Django Login Form: Form is Invalid Despite Correct Credentials
I've been facing an issue with my Django login form. Despite providing the correct credentials, the form consistently returns as invalid. Here’s a detailed description of my setup and the problem I’m encountering. Description I'm using Django's AuthenticationForm to handle user login. My goal is to authenticate users and redirect them to a specific page upon successful login. However, the form validation fails even though the credentials are accurate and the user exists in the database. form.py from django import forms from .models import UserRegister from django.contrib.auth.forms import UserCreationForm , AuthenticationForm from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError class UserRegisterForm(UserCreationForm): username = forms.CharField(max_length=50, required=True, widget=forms.TextInput(attrs={'placeholder': 'Username', 'class': 'input-group'})) email = forms.EmailField(max_length=70, required=True, widget=forms.EmailInput(attrs={'placeholder': 'Email', 'class': 'input-group'})) password1 = forms.CharField(max_length=128, required=True, widget=forms.PasswordInput(attrs={'placeholder': 'Password', 'class': 'input-group', 'id': 'password'})) password2 = forms.CharField(max_length=128, required=True, widget=forms.PasswordInput(attrs={'placeholder': 'Confirm Password', 'class': 'input-group', 'id': 'password'})) class Meta: model = UserRegister fields = ['username', 'email', 'password1', 'password2'] error_messages = { "password_mismatch": "Conform Password Does not match with Password" } def clean_email(self): email = self.cleaned_data.get('email') if UserRegister.objects.filter(email=email).exists(): raise ValidationError('This email address is already in use.') return email def clean_username(self): username = self.cleaned_data.get('username') if UserRegister.objects.filter(username=username).exists(): raise ValidationError('This username is already in use.') return username def clean_password2(self): password1 = self.cleaned_data.get('password1') password2 = self.cleaned_data.get('password2') if password1 … -
How to make Pre-commit ignore when an element is not accessible?
I have this config in my app.rb : from django.apps import AppConfig class WebsiteConfig(AppConfig): default_auto_field = "django.db.models.BigAutoField" name = "website" def ready(self): import website.signals The "website.signals" is not accessible (Pylance) because I am using docker. When the pre-commit is running, it will change my code to: from django.apps import AppConfig class WebsiteConfig(AppConfig): default_auto_field = "django.db.models.BigAutoField" name = "website" def ready(self): pass How do I bypass this in general in my pyproject.toml? I don't want to by pass only the file app.py but for any project I am working on, I want him to not pass if something looks like it is not accessible